• Current
• Archives
• Log In
• Register
• Announcements
• About JLT Articles
• For Authors

Home > Vol 12, No 2 (2018) > Gittel

Benjamin Gittel

In the Mood for Paradox? Das Verhältnis von Fiktion, Stimmung und Welterschließung aus mentalistischer und phänomenologischer Perspektive

Full-length article in: JLT 12/2 (2018), 300–320.

It is widely acknowledged that responses to fiction can be divided into two categories: emotions or moods. Research on the paradox of fiction, however, solely focused on emotional responses to fiction. This paper analyses the different potentials of the mood concept with regard to the paradox of fiction: its potential to avoid the paradox on the one hand and its potential to rise a new paradox of fiction, a paradox of fiction for moods, on the other. To this end, the paper distinguishes two different meanings of the everyday concept of mood and two different paradigms in the research on moods.

The mood concept can designate not only affective states of an individual (moods₁), but elusive, nuanced atmospheres of objects, places or situations (moods₂). The mentalistic paradigm, widespread in psychology and analytic philosophy, generally assumes that moods are mental states with a certain quality of feeling (and physical symptoms). Moods₂ are regarded by such approaches, if they discuss them, as a secondary phenomenon based on subjective perception. In contrast, the phenomenological paradigm focuses on moods₂ and, if it accommodates moods₁ as well, often postulates a characteristic connection between the two: moods₁ reveal extra-individual atmospheres (moods₂) that are assumed to exist in some ontologically robust sense. Therefore, moods₁ can be said to have a world-disclosing function within the phenomenological paradigm.

Researchers in the mentalistic paradigm deal, among other issues, with the difference of emotions and moods₁. One way in which moods₁ differ from emotions is that they lack an intentional object and it is for that reason that the concept of mood₁, at first glance, seems to offer a solution to the paradox of fiction. The paradox of fiction presumes that we have emotions with regard to fictional objects. If it were possible to redescribe the alleged emotions as more subtle mood₁ responses without clear intentional objects, this would undermine a central premise of the paradox and dissolve it. However, such a redescription seems not equally plausible for all cases discussed in the debate (e. g. the green slime case). Therefore, moods₁ can only be one element of a more subtle ›phenomenology‹ of affective reactions towards fiction and the »paradox avoiding potential« of the mood concept is limited.

The paradox creating potential of the mood concept emerges if one takes into account the outlined complex semantics of the concept »mood« and the postulated world-disclosing function of moods₁. It seems possible to construct a new paradox, the paradox of fiction for moods: (a) Only real entities or representations of real entities can evoke moods₁ with world-disclosing function (because this mood₁ evocation is actually immersion in an atmosphere). (b) Many entities in fictions are not real. (c) Nevertheless, fictions can evoke moods₁ with world-disclosing functions (e. g. with regard to places, situations) in the recipient.

The paper argues that the outlined paradox can be dissolved by pointing out that the expression »moods₁ with world-disclosing function« in sentence (a) means something different than in (c). While the expression in (a) relates to the idea of grasping an atmosphere (mood₂) that somehow is »in the world«, it means acquiring a non-propositional form of knowledge, namely knowledge of what-it-is-like to be in a certain situation, in (c). The idea that it is possible to acquire knowledge of what-it-is-like by means of fiction has often been postulated in the research literature, but rarely been spelled out in greater detail. The paper argues that such an acquisition can occur, among other possibilities, on the basis of mood₁ evocation, but that the conditions for the acquisition of knowledge of what-it-is-like by means of fiction are more demanding than under usual circumstances: A recipient of fiction can reasonably be said to acquire knowledge of what-it-is-like to be in a certain situation if the fictional representation evokes a mood₁ which is characteristic of a situation S and the recipient understands this mood₁ as an affective reaction to a situation of the type S. Please note that moods₂ play no explanatory role in the second interpretation of »world-disclosing function«.

Since assumption (a) and assumption (c) concern different world-disclosing functions or, in other words, different mechanisms of world-disclosure, there is no paradox. Although moods₁ evoked by fictional representations (with some limitations pointed out in section 4) do not possess a world-disclosing function in the sense the phenomenological tradition postulated, it is possible to ascribe these moods₁ a world-disclosing function, even within a non-phenomenological framework: They allow the recipient the acquisition of a knowledge of what-it-is-like to be in a certain situation or in a certain place.

Ultimately, for the paradox of fiction for moods seems to hold what could be said about the classical paradox of fiction as well: Even if the paradox ultimately dissolves, its analysis can be instructive for related research fields like the debate on knowledge from fiction which takes moods rarely into account until now.

References

Andermann, Kerstin/Undine Eberlein (Hg.), Gefühle als Atmosphären. Neue Phänomenologie und philosophische Emotionstheorie, Berlin 2011.

Anz, Thomas, Stimmungskunst und -kitsch in der Literatur um 1900. Untersuchungen zum Gelingen und zur Bewertung emotionaler Kommunikation, in: Friederike Reents/Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek (Hg.), Stimmung und Methode, Tübingen 2013, 235–248.

Arburg, Hans-Georg von/Sergej Rickenbacher (Hg.), Concordia discors. Ästhetiken der Stimmung zwischen Literaturen, Künsten und Wissenschaften, Würzburg 2011.

Barbero, Carola, Can We Solve the Paradox of Fiction by Laughing at It?, in: Julien Dutant/Davide Fassio/Anne Meylan (Hg.), Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel, University of Geneva 2014, 92–111, www.unige.ch/lettres/philo/publications/engel/liberamicorum/‌barbero.pdf (06. 02. 2018).

Beedie, Christopher/Peter C. Terry/Andrew M. Lane, Distinctions Between Emotion and Mood, Cognition and Emotion 19:6 (2005), 847–878.

Bieri, Peter, Nominalismus und innere Erfahrung, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 36:1 (1982), 3–24.

Böhme, Gernot, Atmosphäre. Essays zur neuen Ästhetik, Frankfurt a.M. 1995.

Bulka, Thomas, Stimmung, Emotion, Atmosphäre. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Struktur der menschlichen Affektivität, Münster 2015.

Carroll, Noël, Art and Mood, The Monist 86:4 (2003), 520–555.

Cova, Florian/Fabrice Teroni, Is the Paradox of Fiction Soluble in Psychology?, Philosophical Psychology 29:6 (2016), 930–942.

Currie, Gregory, What is Fiction?, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43:4 (1985), 385–392.

Davidson, Richard J., On Emotion, Mood and Related Affective Constructs, in: Paul Ekman/R.J.D. (Hg.), The Nature of Emotion. Fundamental Questions, New York et al. 1994, 51–55.

Depew, David, Empathy, Psychology, and Aesthetics. Reflections on a Repair Concept, An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention 4:1 (2005), 99–107.

Freeman, Damien, The Paradox of Fiction, in: Noël Carroll/John Gibson (Hg.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Literature, London/New York 2016, 247–258.

Fuchs, Thomas, Zur Phänomenologie der Stimmungen, in: Friederike Reents/Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek (Hg.), Stimmung und Methode, Tübingen 2013, 17–31.

Gabás, Raúl, Schelers Phänomenologie der Gefühle und Heideggers Begriff der Stimmung, in: Christian Bermes/Wolfhart Henckmann/Heinz Leonardy (Hg.), Vernunft und Gefühl. Schelers Phänomenologie des emotionalen Lebens, Würzburg 2003, 199–214.

Gabriel, Gottfried, Der Erkenntniswert der Literatur, in: Alexander Löck/Jan Urbich (Hg.), Der Begriff der Literatur. Transdisziplinäre Perspektiven, Berlin et al. 2010, 247–261.

Gaut, Berys, Reasons, Emotions and Fictions, in: Matthew Kieran/Dominic Lopes (Hg.), Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts, London et al. 2010, 15–34.

Geiger, Moritz, Zum Problem der Stimmungseinfühlung, Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 6:1 (1911), 1–42.

Gendler, Tamar Szabó/Karson Kovakovich, Genuine Rational Fictional Emotions, in: Matthew Kieran (Hg.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, Malden, MA 2009, 239–253.

Gisbertz, Anna-Katharina (Hg.), Stimmung. Zur Wiederkehr einer ästhetischen Kategorie, Paderborn 2011.

Gittel, Benjamin, Lebendige Erkenntnis und ihre literarische Kommunikation. Robert Musil im Kontext der Lebensphilosophie, Münster 2013.

Gittel, Benjamin/Robert Deutschländer/Martin Hecht, Conveying Moods and Knowledge-what-it-is-like Through Lyric Poetry, Scientific Study of Literature 6:1 (2016), 131–163.

Green, Melanie C./Christopher Chatham/Marc A. Sestir, Emotion and Transportation into Fact and Fiction, Scientific Study of Literature 2:1 (2012), 37–59.

Griffiths, Paul E., What Emotions Really Are. The Problem of Psychological Categories, Chicago, IL 1997.

Gumbrecht, Hans, Atmosphere, Mood, Stimmung. On a Hidden Potential of Literature, Stanford, CA 2012.

Heidegger, Martin, Sein und Zeit, Tübingen 1927.

Hiergeist, Teresa, Erlesene Erlebnisse. Formen der Partizipation an narrativen Texten, Bielefeld 2014.

Hillebrandt, Claudia, Das emotionale Wirkungspotenzial von Erzähltexten. Mit Fallstudien zu Kafka, Perutz und Werfel, Berlin 2011.

Klages, Ludwig, Ausdrucksbewegung und Gestaltungskraft. Grundlegung der Wissenschaft vom Ausdruck [1921], in: L.K., Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 4, hg. von Ernst Frauchiger, Bonn 1964, 139–314.

Lafont, Cristina, Sprache und Welterschließung. Zur linguistischen Wende der Hermeneutik Heideggers, Frankfurt a.M. 1994.

Levinson, Jerrold, Emotion in Response to Art, in: Mette Hjort/Sue Laver (Hg.), Emotion and the Arts, New York, NY 2010, 20–34.

MacHardy, Karin J., The Boundaries of History and Literature, in: Gisela Brude-Firnau/K.J.M. (Hg.), Fact and Fiction. German History and Literature 1848–1924, Tübingen 1990, 11–25.

Mar, Raymond A./Keith Oatley/Maja Djikic/Justin Mullin, Emotion and Narrative Fiction. Interactive Influences Before, During, and after Reading, Cognition and Emotion 25:5 (2011), 818–833.

Martus, Steffen, Werkpolitik. Zur Literaturgeschichte kritischer Kommunikation vom 17. bis ins 20. Jahrhundert. Mit Studien zu Klopstock, Tieck, Goethe und George, Berlin/New York 2007.

Meyer-Sickendiek, Burkhard, Lyrisches Gespür. Vom geheimen Sensorium der Poesie, Paderborn 2011.

Meyer-Sickendiek, Burckhard, Stimmungen als Gegenstand moderner Lyrik. Zur unabgegoltenen Problematik einer alten Kontroverse, in: Sandra Poppe (Hg.), Emotionen in Literatur und Film, Würzburg 2014, 193–218.

Oatley, Keith, A Taxonomy of the Emotions of Literary Response and a Theory of Identification in Fictional Narrative, Poetics 23:1 (1994), 53–74.

Parsons, Terence, Nonexistent Objects, London/New Haven 1980.

Pavel, Thomas G., Fictional Worlds, Cambridge, MA et al. 1986.

Reents, Friederike, Stimmungsästhetik. Realisierungen in Literatur und Theorie vom 17. bis ins 21. Jahrhundert, Göttingen 2015.

Reents, Friederike/Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek (Hg.), Stimmung und Methode, Tübingen 2013.

Schmitz, Hermann, Der Leib, der Raum und die Gefühle [1998], Bielefeld/Locarno 2007.

Schmitz, Hermann, Atmosphären, Freiburg i.Br./München 2016.

Schmitz, Hermann/Rudolf Owen Müllan/Jan Slaby, Emotions Outside the Box. The New Phenomenology of Feeling and Corporeality, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10:2 (2011), 241–259.

Stecker, Robert, Should We Still Care About the Paradox of Fiction?, British Journal of Aesthetics 51:3 (2011), 295–308.

Strack, Fritz/Atilla Höfling, Von Atmosphären, Stimmungen & Gefühlen, in: Rainer Goetz/Stefan Graupner (Hg.), Atmosphäre(n). Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen an einen unscharfen Begriff, München 2007, 103–111.

Stroud, Scott R., Simulation, Subjective Knowledge, and the Cognitive Value of Literary Narrative, Journal of Aesthetic Education 42:3 (2008), 19–41.

Stueber, Karsten, Empathy, in: Edward N. Zalta (Hg.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford 2014, https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2014/‌entries/empathy/ (13. 02. 2018).

Tye, Michael, Knowing What It is Like, in: Peter J. Ludlow/Yujin Nagasawa/Daniel Stoljar (Hg.), There’s Something About Mary. Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument, Cambridge, MA et al. 2004, 143–161.

Vendrell Ferran, Íngrid, Die Emotionen. Gefühle in der realistischen Phänomenologie, Berlin 2009.

Vendrell Ferran, Íngrid, Das Wissen der Literatur und die epistemische Kraft der Imagination, in: Christoph Demmerling/I.V.F. (Hg.), Wahrheit, Wissen und Erkenntnis in der Literatur. Philosophische Beiträge, Berlin 2014, 119–140.

Walsh, Dorothy, Literature and Knowledge, Middletown, CT 1969.

Walton, Kendall, Fearing Fictions, The Journal of Philosophy 75:1 (1978), 5–27.

Walton, Kendall, Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA et al. 1990.

Walton, Kendall, In Other Shoes. Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence, Oxford et al. 2015.

Wellbery, David E., Stimmung, in: Karlheinz Barck et al. (Hg.), Ästhetische Grundbegriffe. Historisches Wörterbuch in sieben Bänden, Bd. 5, Stuttgart 2003, 703–733.

Winko, Simone, Kodierte Gefühle. Zu einer Poetik der Emotionen in lyrischen und poetologischen Texten um 1900, Berlin 2003.

Zipfel, Frank, Emotion und Fiktion. Zur Relevanz des Fiktions-Paradoxes für eine Theorie der Emotionalisierung in Literatur und Film, in: Sandra Poppe (Hg.), Emotionen in Literatur und Film, Würzburg 2011, 127–154.

2018-09-16

JLTonline ISSN 1862-8990

Copyright © by the author. All rights reserved.
This work may be copied for non-profit educational use if proper credit is given to the author and JLTonline.
For other permission, please contact JLTonline.

Copyright © 2007 – present JLTonline

Contact Webmaster