• Current
• Archives
• Log In
• Register
• Announcements
• About JLT Articles
• For Authors

Home > Vol 11, No 2 (2017) > Hartner

Marcus Hartner

Bodies, Spaces, and Cultural Models: On Bridging the Gap between Culture and Cognition

(Abstract)

Full-length article in: JLT 11/2 (2017), 204–222.

Over the past two decades cognitive literary studies (CLS) has emerged as a new subfield of literary studies. Despite the success of cognitive theories in some areas of research such as in narratology, however, the impact of CLS on the academic discipline of literary and cultural studies as a whole has not been as profound as predicted. Major schools of research, e.g. postcolonial studies or gender studies, remain virtually untouched, and the vast majority of literary scholars are still sceptical or indifferent towards this area of research. Reasons for this scepticism include, for example, epistemological and methodological uncertainties concerning the interdisciplinary intersection of science and literature. But scholars have also begun to address another lacuna in contemporary research that may prove to be of equal or even more profound consequence: the lack of a solid and widely accepted conceptual and analytical bridge between cognitive approaches and the wide field of cultural studies. It is a well-known fact that the study of culture in its many theoretical guises has taken a lead role in philology departments around the globe. Though not every scholar welcomes this development, it would certainly be unwise to ignore the general impact of cultural studies on philology. For this reason, my paper argues that CLS not only needs to engage in a productive interdisciplinary dialogue between literary scholars and cognitive scientists but it also needs to incorporate cultural studies into this dialogue. In other words, an important challenge lies in making cognitive approaches relevant for cultural analysis.

This paper engages with current attempts to face this challenge. It provides a survey of approaches that aim to build a conceptual bridge between culture and cognition and thus take a step towards extending cognitive approaches into the field of cultural studies. For this purpose, I adopt the distinction between so-called ›first‹ and ›second generation‹ approaches in order to group this research heuristically into two academic camps: (1) approaches that emphatically foreground so-called second generation cognitive science as their prime source of inspiration, i.e. approaches that engage with enactive, embedded, extended, and embodied aspects of cognition; and (2) studies which do not explicitly situate themselves within this paradigm and rather seek innovation by turning to more ›classical‹, foundational ›first generation‹ concepts of mental representation, information- and text processing. By discussing examples from both lines of research, including work by Kukkonen/Caracciolo (2014), Strasen (2013), Sommer (2013), and Hartner/Schneider (2015), my survey attempts to provide an impression of the wealth of creative thinking currently at work in CLS. In this context, the paper discusses some of the major challenges cognitive approaches are facing today; it traces a selection of current developments in the field, including work on the concept of ›cultural models‹, the notion of the ›intercultural mind‹, and the attempt to programmatically ground conceptualizations of cognition in our bodily interactions with culture and the environment.

All in all, I argue that despite the efforts towards a systematic cognitive investigation of culture sketched in this survey, the project of cognitive cultural studies in general is still in its infancy. Its work is conducted by a comparatively small group of enthusiasts and constitutes a highly-specialized academic niche within a multitude of postclassical approaches to literature. Whether it will be possible to interest the much larger body of ›traditional‹ literary and cultural scholars in cognitive approaches, in my opinion, will to no small degree hinge on the field’s ability to move beyond abstract theoretical reflection. While there is obviously nothing intrinsically wrong with specialized fields of research beyond the mainstream, I believe that cognitive approaches have the potential to reach a wider audience. However, this may depend on the ability of CLS to develop concepts and methods capable of analysing concrete cultural phenomena in their social and historical context.

References

Abbott, H. Porter, Cognitive Literary Studies. The ›Second Generation‹ [Review of Ellen Spolsky’s The Work of Fiction], Poetics Today 27:4 (2006), 711–722.

Adler, Hans/Sabine Gross, Adjusting the Frame. Comments on Cognitivism and Literature, Poetics Today 23:2 (2002), 195–220.

Aldama, Frederick L., Introduction. The Sciences and the Humanities Matter as One, in: F.L.A. (ed.), Toward a Cognitive Theory of Narrative Acts, Austin 2010, 1–9.

Bal, Mieke, Travelling Concepts in the Humanities. A Rough Guide, Toronto et al. 2002.

Barsalou, Lawrence W. et al., Social Embodiment, Psychology of Learning and Motivation 43 (2003), 43–92.

Bernaerts et al. (eds.), Stories and Minds. Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative, Lincoln et al. 2013.

Bortolussi, Marisa/Peter Dixon, Minding the Text. Memory for Literary Narrative, in: Lars Bernaerts et al. (eds.), Stories and Minds. Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative, Lincoln et al. 2013, 23–37.

Burke, Michael, Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion. An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind, New York et al. 2011.

Burke, Michael/Emily T. Troscianko, Science and Literary Criticism, www.fabula.org/actualites/science-literary-criticism_49420.php (22.06.2017).

Burke, Michael/Emily T. Troscianko (eds.), Cognitive Literary Science. Dialogues between Literature and Cognition, Oxford 2016.

Caracciolo, Marco, Interpretation for the Bodies. Bridging the Gap, Style 48:3 (2014), 385–403.

Caracciolo, Marco, Cognitive Literary Studies and the Status of Interpretation. An Attempt at Conceptual Mapping, New Literary History 47:1 (2016), 187–207.

Clark, Andy, Being There. Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge 1997.

Clark, Billy, Salient Inferences. Pragmatics and The Inheritors, Language and Literature. Journal of the Poetics and Linguistics Association 18:2 (2009), 173–212.

Dannenberg, Hilary, Fleshing Out the Blend. The Representation of Counterfactuals in Alternate History in Print, Film, and Television Narratives, in: Ralf Schneider/Marcus Hartner (eds.), Blending and the Study of Narrative. Approaches and Applications, Berlin et al. 2012, 121–145.

Evans, Vyvyan/Melanie Green, Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction, Edinburgh 2006.

Faist, Thomas, The Border-Crossing Expansion of Social Space. Concepts, Questions, and Topics, in: Thomas Faist/Eyüp Özveren (eds.), Transnational Social Spaces. Agents, Networks, and Institutions, Aldershot 2004, 1–34.

Faist, Thomas, The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces [2000], Oxford et al. 2008.

Fauconnier, Gilles/Mark Turner, The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York 2002.

Fludernik, Monika, Afterword, Style 48:3 (2014), 404–410.

Hart, F. Elizabeth, The Epistemology of Cognitive Literary Studies, Philosophy and Literature 25:2 (2001), 314–334.

Hartner, Marcus, Perspektivische Interaktion im Roman. Kognition, Rezeption, Interpretation, Berlin et al. 2012.

Hartner, Marcus, Scientific Concepts in Literary Studies. Towards Criteria for the Meeting of Literature and Cognitive Science, in: Michael Burke/Emily T. Troscianko (eds.), Cognitive Literary Science. Dialogues between Literature and Cognition, Oxford 2016, 17–34.

Hartner, Marcus/Ralf Schneider, British Novels of Migration and the Construction of Transnational Social Spaces, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63:4 (2015), 411–431.

Herman, David, Story Logic. Problems and Possibilities of Narrative, Lincoln et al. 2002.

Herman, David (ed.), Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences, Stanford 2003.

Herman, David, Narrative Theory after the Second Cognitive Revolution, in: Lisa Zunshine (ed.), Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies, Baltimore 2010, 155–175.

Herman, David, Narrative Worldmaking across Media and Disciplines, American Council of Learned Societies (2011), www.acls.org/news/5-24-11 (22.06.2017).

Hogan, Patrick, Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts, London/New York 2003 (Hogan 2003a).

Hogan, Patrick, The Mind and Its Stories. Narrative Universals and Human Emotion, Cambridge et al. 2003 (Hogan 2003b).

Holland, Dorothy/Naomi Quinn (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Cambridge 1987.

Jackson, Tony E., Questioning Interdisciplinarity. Cognitive Science, Evolutionary Psychology, and Literary Criticism, Poetics Today 21:2 (2000), 319–347.

Jackson, Tony E., Why the Novel Happened. A Cognitive Explanation, Philosophy and Literature 38 (2014), A75–A93.

Jaén, Isabel/Julien J. Simon (eds.), Cognitive Literary Studies. Current Themes and New Directions, Austin 2012.

Johnson, Mark, The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason, Chicago 1987.

Jones, Edward G./Lorne M. Mendell, Assessing the Decade of the Brain, Science 284:5414 (1999), 739.

Keen, Suzanne, Empathy and the Novel, Oxford 2007.

Kramnick, Jonathan, Against Literary Darwinism, Critical Inquiry 37:2 (2011), 315–347.

Krois, Michael et al., Introduction, in: M.K. et al. (eds.), Embodiment in Cognition and Culture, Amsterdam 2007, xiii–xxii.

Kukkonen, Karin, Presence and Prediction. The Embodied Reader’s Cascades of Cognition, Style 48:3 (2014), 367–384.

Kukkonen, Karin/Marco Caracciolo, Introduction. What is the ›Second Generation‹, Style 48:3 (2014), 261–274.

Kuzmičová, Anežka, Literary Narrative and Mental Imagery. A View from Embodied Cognition, Style 48:3 (2014), 275–293.

Lakoff, George/Mark Johnson, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago et al. 1980.

Lakoff, George/Mark Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York 1999.

McConachie, Bruce, Towards a Cognitive Cultural Hegemony, in: Lisa Zunshine (ed.), Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies, Baltimore 2010, 134–153.

Meier, Brian P. et al., Embodiment in Social Psychology, Topics in Cognitive Science 4:4 (2012), 705–716.

Menary, Richard, Introduction to the Special Issue on 4E Cognition, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (2010), 459–463.

Nünning, Vera, Reading Fictions, Changing Minds. The Cognitive Value of Fiction, Heidelberg 2014.

Nünning, Vera/Ansgar Nünning/Birgit Neumann (eds.), Cultural Ways of Worldmaking. Media and Narratives, Berlin et al. 2010.

Palmer, Alan, Fictional Minds, Lincoln et al. 2004.

Richardson, Alan, Studies in Literature and Cognition. A Field Map, in: A.R./Ellen Spolsky (eds.), The Work of Fiction. Cognition, Culture, and Complexity, Aldershot 2004, 1–29.

Ryan, Marie-Laure, Narratology and Cognitive Science. A Problematic Relation, Style 44:4 (2010), 469–495.

Saravese, John/Colin Jager, Cognition, Culture, Romanticism. A Review Essay, Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net 57–58 (2010), www.erudit.org/revue/ravon/2010/v/n57-58/1006519ar.html (22.6.2017).

Schneider, Ralf, The Cognitive Theory of Character Reception. An Updated Proposal, Anglistik 24:2 (2013), 117–134.

Sheenan, Paul, Continental Drift. The Clash Between Literary Studies and Cognitive Literary Studies, in: Chris Danta/Helen Groth (eds.), Mindful Aesthetics. Literature and the Science of Mind, New York et al. 2014, 47–58.

Shore, Brad, Culture in Mind. Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning, New York et al. 1996.

Simerka, Barbara, Knowing Subjects. Cognitive Cultural Studies and Early Modern Spanish Literature, West Lafayette 2013.

Slingerland, Edward, What Science Offers the Humanities. Integrating Body and Culture, Cambridge et al. 2008.

Snow, Charles P., The Two Cultures and a Second Look. An Expanded Version of the Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge 1965.

Sommer, Roy, ›Contextualism‹ Revisited. A Survey (and Defence) of Postcolonial and Intercultural Narratologies, Journal of Literary Theory 1:1 (2007), 61–79.

Sommer, Roy, Other Stories, Other Minds. The Intercultural Potential of Cognitive Approaches to Narrative, in: Lars Bernaerts et al. (eds.), Stories and Minds. Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative, Lincoln et al. 2013, 155–174.

Spolsky, Ellen, Gaps in Nature. Literary Interpretation and the Modular Mind, Albany 1993.

Spolsky, Ellen, Preface, in: Alan Richardson/E.S. (eds.), The Work of Fiction. Cognition, Culture, and Complexity, Aldershot et al. 2004, vii–xiii.

Stockwell, Peter, Cognitive Poetics. An Introduction, London et al. 2002.

Strasen, Sven, Cultural Models, Cognitive Environment and the Reading of Literary Texts. Towards a Cognitive Reinvigoration of Reader-Response Theory, in: Klaus Stierstorfer (ed.), Anglistentag Münster 2007. Proceedings, Trier 2008, 199–207.

Strasen, Sven, The Return of the Reader. The Disappearance of Literary Reception Theories and their Revival as a Part of a Cognitive Theory of Culture, Anglistik 24:2 (2013), 31–48.

Strauss, Claudia/Naomi Quinn, A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning, Cambridge 1997.

Sutton, John, Memory and the Extended Mind. Embodiment, Cognition, and Culture, Cognitive Processing 6:4 (2005), 223–226.

Turner, Mark, Reading Minds. The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science, Princeton 1991.

Turner, Mark, The Literary Mind, New York/Oxford 1996.

Valera, Francisco/Evan Thompson/Eleanor Rosch, The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge 1991.

Vygotsky, Lev S., Dynamics and Structure of the Adolescent’s Personality [1930–1931], in: L.S.V., The Essential Vygotsky, ed. by Robert W. Rieber, New York 2004, 471–490.

Zunshine, Lisa, Why We Read Fiction. Theory of Mind and the Novel, Columbus 2006.

Zunshine, Lisa (ed.), Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies, Baltimore 2010.

Zunshine, Lisa (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies, Oxford et al. 2015.

2017-09-22

JLTonline ISSN 1862-8990

Copyright © by the author. All rights reserved.
This work may be copied for non-profit educational use if proper credit is given to the author and JLTonline.
For other permission, please contact JLTonline.

Copyright © 2007 – present JLTonline

Contact Webmaster