Email this article Íngrid Vendrell Ferran
Emotion in the Appreciation of Fiction
Full-length article in: JLT 12/2 (2018), 204–223.
Why is it that we respond emotionally to plays, movies, and novels and feel moved by characters and situations that we know do not exist? This question, which constitutes the kernel of the debate on »the paradox of fiction«, speaks to the perennial themes of philosophy, and remains of interest to this day. But does this question entail a paradox? A significant group of analytic philosophers have indeed thought so. Since the publication of Colin Radford’s celebrated paper »How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?« (1975), the number of proposals to solve, explain, reformulate, dismiss or even revitalize this apparent paradox has continued to proliferate. In line with recent developments in the philosophy of emotion, in this paper I will argue against the sustainability of the paradox, claiming that the only reasonable way to continue our discussions about it consists in using it as a heuristic tool to shed light on problems regarding our involvement with fiction. Against this background, I will then focus on one of the problems related to how our emotional responses to fiction contribute to our appreciation of it.
The paper is divided into three main sections. The first section shows the parallel evolution of the paradox of fiction and the analytic philosophy of emotion. Here I claim that, although the paradox is epistemically flawed, since one of its premises is rooted in a limited view on the emotions typical of early cognitivism, the discussions it provokes are still epistemically useful. As Robert Stecker (2011, 295), among others, has pointed out, the paradox was formulated during the heyday of cognitive theories of the emotions in which emotion necessarily requires belief. Today, however, only few authors would endorse this premise. If emotion does not always require belief (as the majority of authors in the contemporary debate admit), let alone belief about the existence of the object towards which it is directed, then there is no reason to speak of a paradox. From this first conclusion, however, it does not follow that the paradox is completely without use from the epistemic point of view. A glimpse at the topics touched on during the discussions about how to solve, reformulate, or negate the paradox reveals their value in shedding light on the interrelation between emotion and fiction.
The second section elaborates a phenomenologically inspired cognitive account of the emotions by focusing on their cognitive bases, their influence on cognitions, and their cognitive function. In this model, emotions are responsible for indicating values, for showing what matters to us, and for being appropriate to their objects. My claim is that this view applies not only to reality, but also to our involvement with fiction.
In the final section I draw on this account to focus on one kind of appreciation of fiction which necessarily requires our emotional involvement. Following an idea put forward by Susan Feagin (1996, 1), I employ the concept of »appreciation« to refer to a set of abilities exercised with the aim of extracting value from the work. There is a long tradition in aesthetics that condemns any focus on the emotions in the appreciation of art and fiction, and defends the necessity of aesthetic appreciation without emotional influence. To refer to this negative attitude towards the emotions, I will borrow an expression coined by Susan Feagin (2013, 636), who refers to »the intellectualized view of appreciation«. Against this widespread view, I will argue that some aspects of the fiction can only be appreciated with the help of our emotions. The cognitive approach developed in the previous section can explain how the emotions might in fact play a significant role in the appreciation of art and fiction. Attention will be paid to three activities involved in appreciation, for all of which emotion is crucial: processing relevant information about the fictional world, understanding aspects of it, and becoming acquainted with the values it presents. My aim here is to argue that there are particular aspects of the fictional world that can only be appreciated if recipients have the appropriate emotions.
References
Cova, Florian/Fabrice Teroni, Is the Paradox of Fiction Soluble in Psychology?, Philosophical Psychology 29:6 (2016), 930–942.
Currie, Gregory/Ian Ravenscroft, Recreative Minds. Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology, Oxford 2002.
Dokic, Jérome/Stéphane Lemaire, Are Emotions Perceptions of Value?, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43:2 (2013), 227–247.
Elster, Jon, Alchemies of the Mind, Cambridge et al. 1999.
Feagin, Susan L., Reading with Feeling. The Aesthetics of Appreciation, Ithaca, NY 1996.
Feagin, Susan L., Affects in Appreciation, in: Peter Goldie (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, Oxford 2013, 635–650.
Geiger, Moritz, Beiträge zur Phänomenologie des ästhetischen Genusses [1913], Tübingen 21974.
Goldie, Peter, The Emotions. A Philosophical Exploration, Oxford 2002.
Greenspan, Patricia, A Case of Mixed Feelings. Ambivalence and the Logic of Emotion, in: Amélie O. Rorty (ed.), Explaining Emotions, Berkeley, CA 1980, 223–250.
Kenny, Anthony, Action, Emotion and Will, London 1963.
Levinson, Jerrold, Emotion in Response to Art, in: Mette Hjort/Sue Laver (eds.), Emotion and the Arts, Oxford 1997, 20–36.
Marks, Joel, A Theory of Emotions, Philosophical Studies 42:1 (1982), 227–242.
Matravers, Derek, The Challenge of Irrationalism, and How Not to Meet It, in: Matthew Kieran (ed.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, Oxford 2006, 254–264.
Meinong, Alexius, Über Urteilsgefühle, was sie sind und was sie nicht sind (1904), in: A.M., Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 1: Abhandlungen zur Psychologie, ed. by Rudolf Haller/Rudolf Kindinger/Roderick M. Chisholm, Graz 1969, 577–616.
Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, The Fiction of the Paradox. Really Feeling for Anna Karenina, in: Ylva Gustafsson/Camilla Kronqvist/Michael McEachrane (eds.), Emotions and Understanding. Wittgensteinian Perspectives, Basingstoke et al. 2009, 165–184.
Mulligan, Kevin, Husserl on the »Logics« of Valuing, Values and Norms, in: Beatrice Centi/Gianna Gigliotti (eds.), Fenomenologia della Ragion Pratica. L’Etica di Edmund Husserl, Naples 2004, 177–225.
Ortega y Gasset, José, La deshumanización del arte (1925), in: J.O. G., Obras Completas, Tomo III: 1917–1925, Madrid 2002, 847–878.
Prinz, Jesse, Embodied Emotions, in: Robert Solomon (ed.), Thinking about Feeling. Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, Oxford 2004, 44–60.
Radford, Colin, How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 49 (1975), 67–80.
Reinach, Adolf, Die Überlegung; ihre ethische und rechtliche Bedeutung (1912/1913), in: A.R., Sämtliche Werke. Textkritische Ausgabe in zwei Bänden, Vol. 1: Die Werke, ed. by Karl Schuhmann/Barry Smith, München 1989, 279–311.
Robinson, Jenefer, Deeper than Reason. Emotion and its Role in Literature, Music, and Art, Oxford 2005.
Robinson, Jenefer, Emotional Responses to Music. What Are They? How Do They Work? And Are They Relevant to Aesthetic Appreciation?, in: Peter Goldie (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, Oxford 2013, 651–680.
Scheler, Max, Formalism in Ethics and Non-formal Ethics of Values, Evanston, IL 1973.
Solomon, Robert C., The Passions. Emotions and the Meaning of Life, Indianapolis, IN 1993.
Stecker, Robert, Should We Still Care About the Paradox of Fiction?, British Journal of Aesthetics 51:3 (2011), 295–308.
Tappolet, Christine, Émotions et Valeurs, Paris 2000.
Taylor, Gabrielle, Pride, Shame and Guilt. Emotions of Self-Assessment, Oxford 1985.
Vendrell Ferran, Íngrid, Die Emotionen. Gefühle in der realistischen Phänomenologie, Berlin 2008.
Vendrell Ferran, Íngrid, Das Paradoxon der Fiktion, in: Tobias Klauk/Tilman Köppe (ed.), Fiktionalität. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, Berlin et al. 2014, 313–337.
Walton, Kendall L., Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA 1993.
2018-09-16
JLTonline ISSN 1862-8990
Copyright © by the author. All rights reserved.
This work may be copied for non-profit educational use if proper credit is given to
the author and JLTonline.
For other permission, please contact .
How to cite this item:
Abstract of: Íngrid Vendrell Ferran, Emotion in the Appreciation of Fiction.
In: JLTonline (16.09.2018)
URL: http://www.jltonline.de/index.php/articles/article/view/971/2276
A Persistent Identifier can be found in the PDF-Version of this article.