1

Andreas Ohme

Der heterodiegetische Präsensroman – ein Fall von

unreliable narration?

(Abstract)

Full-length article in: JLT 12/1 (2018), 93–112.

Research has shown that the present-tense novel poses significant logical problems of narrative mediation. For this reason, the current essay addresses the question of whether, due to these problems, the heterodiegetic present-tense novel is a case of unreliable narration. To this end, the essay first discusses the sustainability of the concept of unreliability. Its point of departure is the observation that researchers have created significant confusion by applying a characterological concept to literary phenomena. Despite an overwhelming amount of pertinent essays and monographs on the topic, the central questions raised by this concept are still highly contested: To which narrative instances can we plausibly apply the category of unreliability? Precisely which narratological aspects of the mediating instance can we account for using the category of unreliability?

Using the example of Holden Caulfield, the narrating protagonist from J. D. Salinger’s novel The Cather in the Rye, this essay demonstrates which difficulties arise when we impute unreliability to a complex narrative instance. The lack of conceptual precision which comes to light in this novel not only leads – as in the case of Catcher in the Rye – to contradictory assignments of the category of unreliability in one and the same text but also to the constitution of a text corpus that is primarily characterized by its heterogeneity. This undermines the intersubjective use of concepts and, as a result, further literary knowledge. Therefore, this essay argues that we should abandon the concept of unreliability in favor of more precise analytic categories, instead of making the discussion of this category even more unwieldy than it already is by adding new definitions and thereby impeding agreement within the scientific community.

In order to more precisely define the logical problems of narrative mediation of the heterodiegetic present-tense novel, the essay will first define the speech acts of narration, taking the temporal relation between the narrative procedure and the narrated events as the identifying feature. In the process, the use of the simple-past tense proves to be constitutive, not only because of experience in daily life with the speech act of narration but also and above all for logical reasons. Here, the preterit retains its deictic function of referring to the past. In terms of genre, the present-tense novel resembles drama, since there too the mediating instance makes use of the present tense as the marginal text does in drama. This is why we can also no longer refer to a narrative speech act in the case of the present-tense novel. Rather, the present-tense novel creates the same impression as the speech act of live reportage in daily life. Connected to this, however, are perspectival restrictions of the spatial and temporal type (predominantly zeitdeckende Vermittlung, where narrating time matches narrated time; uncertainty about the future, spatial fixity), but primarily with respect to the representation of another consciousness (extremely limited introspection). However, because the mediating instance in the present-tense novel tends not to adhere to these restrictions, we are confronted with a paradoxical form of narrative mediation.

Depending on the design of a text, the reader can either become aware of this paradox or it can remain hidden from him or her. The latter is the case in Andrea Camilleri’s crime novel Il tuttomio (2013), which aims to make the recipient as focused on the plot as possible and hence to heighten the suspense that is constitutive for the genre of the crime novel. It is probably for this reason that the present tense emerges more frequently in recent crime novels. This is also the case for Stefan Slupetzky’s novel Das Schweigen des Lemming (2006), although in this text the form of narrative mediation – in contrast to Camilleri’s text – is extremely conspicuous. The rhetorical prominence of the mediating instance and the technique of montage, coupled with the use of the present-tense, work to disrupt the illusion. Accompanying the suspense on the level of the plot is a meta-fictional layer that prompts the reader to reflect upon the conventions of the crime novel.

The essay then briefly presents two texts which, each in a different way, legitimate the use of the present tense, so that the impression of a paradoxical form of narrative mediation does not at all arise. In Wojciech Kuczok’s novel Senność (2008), the mediating instance repeatedly creates the impression, through its particular behavior, that the present text is a screenplay, a genre for which the present tense is constitutive. In Vladimir Makanin’s short novel Laz (1991), on the other hand, the present tense functions as the tense which signals timelessness, thus underscoring the allegorical character of the text.

Even when such strategies of legitimation significantly attenuate the paradoxical effect of present-tense usage, we nonetheless have to remain cognizant of the fact that the transgression of its restrictions raises fundamental logical problems of narrative mediation, since we cannot plausibly explain the accompanying enlargement of the mediating instance’s perceptual perspective. In this sense, we could regard the specific form of narrative mediation in the present-tense novel as a case of unreliable narration. This would entail, however, that we broaden even more the umbrella term of unreliability, as scholars have already been doing for some time now. But that would accomplish precisely the opposite of what scientific concept-building should in fact strive for: namely, to describe textual phenomena with the greatest terminological precision and thereby to ensure agreement within the scientific community.

References

Asmuth, Bernhard, Einführung in die Dramenanalyse [1980], Stuttgart/Weimar 51997.

Aumüller, Matthias, Literaturwissenschaftliche Erzählbegriffe, in: M.A. (Hg.), Narrativität als Begriff. Analysen und Anwendungsbeispiele zwischen philologischer und anthropologischer Orientierung, Berlin/Boston 2012, 141–168.

Avanessian, Armen/Anke Hennig (Hg.), Der Präsensroman, Berlin/Boston 2013.

Baumbach, Jonathan, The Saint as a Young Man. A Reappraisal of The Catcher in the Rye, in: Joel Salzberg (Hg.), Critical Essays on Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, Boston, MA 1990, 55–64.

Booth, Wayne C., The Rhetoric of Fiction, Chicago, IL et al. 1961.

Booth, Wayne C., The Company We Keep. An Ethics of Fiction, Berkeley, CA et al. 1988.

Camilleri, Andrea, Mein Ein und Alles [2013], Reinbek b.H. 2016.

Chatman, Seymour, Coming to Terms. The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film, Ithaca, NY et al. 1990.

Cohn, Dorrit, Discordant Narration, Style 34:2 (2000), 307–316.

Cohn, Dorrit, »Ich döse und wache«. Die Normabweichung gleichzeitigen Erzählens, in: Armen Avanessian/Anke Hennig (Hg.), Der Präsensroman, Berlin/Boston 2013, 125–138.

Cowan, Michael, Holden’s Musem Pieces. Narrator and Nominal Audience in The Catcher in the Rye, in: Jack Salzman (Hg.), New Essays on The Catcher in the Rye, Cambridge, UK et al. 1991, 35–55.

Doležel, Lubomír, The Typology of the Narrator. Point of View in Fiction, in: To Honor Roman Jakobson. Essays on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, 11. October 1966, Vol. 1, den Haag et al. 1967, 541–552.

Hamburger, Käte, Die Logik der Dichtung [1957], München 31987.

Heyd, Theresa, Understanding and Handling Unreliable Narratives. A Pragmatic Model and Method, Semiotica 162 (2006), 217–243.

Heyd, Theresa, Unreliability. The Pragmatic Perspective Revisited, Journal of Literary Theory 5:1 (2011), 3–17.

Ingarden, Roman, Das literarische Kunstwerk [1931], Tübingen 41972.

Irving, Joanne, Holden Caulfield Is Afraid of Growing Up and Competing in an Adult World, in: Dedria Bryfonski (Hg.), Depression in J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, Detroit, MI et al. 2009, 112–123.

Jahn, Manfred, Package Deals, Exklusionen, Randzonen. Das Phänomen der Unverläßlichkeit in den Erzählsituationen, in: Ansgar Nünning (Hg.), Unreliable Narration. Studien zur Theorie und Praxis unglaubwürdigen Erzählens in der englischsprachigen Literatur, Trier 1998, 81–106.

Jedličková, Alice, An Unreliable Narrator in an Unreliable World. Negotiating between Rhetorical Narratology, Cognitive Studies and Possible Worlds Theory, in: Elke D’hoker/Gunther Martens (Hg.), Narrative Unreliability in the Twentieth-Century First-Person Novel, Berlin/New York 2008, 281–302.

Kahrmann, Cordula/Gunter Reiß/Manfred Schluchter, Erzähltextanalyse. Eine Einführung [1986], Frankfurt a. M. 21991.

Kindt, Tom/Tilman Köppe, Preface, Journal of Literary Theory 5:1 (2011), 1.

Köppe, Tilman/Tom Kindt, Erzähltheorie. Eine Einführung, Stuttgart 2014.

Kuczok, Wojciech, Senność, Warschau 2008.

Kuczok, Wojciech, Lethargie [2008], Frankfurt a. M. 2010.

Lagoni, Frederike, Fiktionales versus faktuales Erzählen fremden Bewusstseins, Berlin/Boston 2016.

Martínez, Matías/Michael Scheffel, Einführung in die Erzähltheorie [1999], München 52003.

Nünning, Ansgar, Unreliable Narration zur Einführung. Grundzüge einer kognitiv-narratologischen Theorie und Analyse unglaubwürdigen Erzählens, in: A.N. (Hg.), Unreliable Narration. Studien zur Theorie und Praxis unglaubwürdigen Erzählens in der englischsprachigen Erzählliteratur, Trier 1998, 3–39.

Nünning, Vera, Preface and Acknowledgments, in: V.N. (Hg.), Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness. Intermedial and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Berlin/Boston 2015, v–vi.

Ohme, Andreas, Der rätselhafte Holden Caulfield. Die Erzählstrategie und ihre Folgen für das Textverständnis in J. D. Salingers The Catcher in the Rye, Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch 54 (2013), 265–288.

Ohme, Andreas, Skaz und Unreliable Narration. Entwurf einer neuen Typologie des Erzählers, Berlin/Boston 2015.

Ohme, Andreas, Strukturalismus heute! Eine Kritik des Ethical Criticism aus strukturalistischer Perspektive am Beispiel der Narratologie, in: Martin Endres/Leonhard Herrmann (Hg.), Strukturalismus, heute (im Druck).

Olson, Greta, Reconsidering Unreliability. Fallible and Untrustworthy Narrators, Narrative 11:1 (2003), 93–109.

Pfister, Manfred, Das Drama. Theorie und Analyse [1977], München 51988.

Phelan, James/Mary Patricia Martin, The Lessons of Weymouth. Homodiegesis, Unreliability, Ethics and The Remains of the Day, in: David Herman (Hg.), Narratologies. New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, Columbus, OH 1999, 88–109.

Riggan, William, Picaros, Madmen, Naïfs, and Clowns. The Unreliable First-Person Narrator, Norman, OK 1981.

Salinger, Jerome D., The Catcher in the Rye [1951], Boston, MA et al. 2001.

Seng, Peter J., Holden Caulfield Is Unable to Cope with an Adult World, in: Dedria Bryfonski (Hg.), Depression in J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, Detroit, MI et al. 2009, 103–111.

Shaw, Peter, Love and Death in The Catcher in the Rye, in: Jack Salzman (Hg.), New Essays on The Catcher in the Rye, Cambridge, UK et al. 1991, 97–114.

Slupetzky, Stefan, Das Schweigen des Lemming [2006], Reinbek b.H. 2010.

Stanzel, Franz K., Theorie des Erzählens [1979], Göttingen ³1985.

Wall, Kathleen, The Remains of the Day and its Challenges to Theories of Unreliable Narration, The Journal of Narrative Technique 24:1 (1994), 18–42.

Weinrich, Harald, Tempus. Besprochene und erzählte Welt, Stuttgart et al. 1964.

Wolf, Werner, Ästhetische Illusion und Illusionsdurchbrechung in der Erzählkunst. Theorie und Geschichte mit Schwerpunkt auf englischem illusionsstörenden Erzählen, Tübingen 1993.

2018-04-06

JLTonline ISSN 1862-8990

Copyright © by the author. All rights reserved.
This work may be copied for non-profit educational use if proper credit is given to the author and JLTonline.
For other permission, please contact JLTonline.

How to cite this item:

Abstract of: Andreas Ohme, Der heterodiegetische Präsensroman – ein Fall von unreliable narration?

In: JLTonline (06.04.2018)

URL: http://www.jltonline.de/index.php/articles/article/view/951/2211

A Persistent Identifier can be found in the PDF-Version of this article.